Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney
call for a free consultation

The Presumption of Innocence & Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

A bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system is that a defendant accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  This protection derives from the due process guarantees in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and exists to guard against convictions based on factual error.  You may wonder, especially if you are involved in a criminal case, what does it really mean?

The presumption of innocence and the burden of proof work together.  Essentially, the presumption  transfers to the prosecution the obligation to prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  This means that, if you are charged with a crime, you are not required to prove that you did not do it.  At least in theory, you can say absolutely nothing at all, and the entire responsibility to prove guilt rests with the government.

Thus, in every criminal case, the government must show that:

  1. The accused actually committed the criminal act; and
  2. The accused had the necessary intent to commit the crime. The requisite intent depends on the crime charged.  Under some circumstances, negligence or reckless indifference to harm is enough.  In others, such as murder, the ultimate outcome must have been intended.

“Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt” means that the evidence must be so convincing that a reasonable person could not doubt the defendant’s guilt.  Another way to put it is that there could be no reasonable alternative to the defendant’s guilt. Note that the prosecution is not required to eliminate every vestige of doubt, as long as any remaining doubt would be irrational.  A belief that the defendant probably did it is insufficient, in contrast to the burden of proof in civil cases. In civil cases, where the standard of proof is a mere preponderance of the evidence, it is enough to prove that one version of events is more likely to be true than another.

The Florida Standard Jury Instructions for criminal cases explain that a reasonable doubt is “not a mere possible doubt, a speculative, imaginary or forced doubt.”  Rather, a juror must vote to convict if, based solely on the evidence introduced at the trial, he or she is left with “an abiding conviction of guilt.”  Reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt “may arise from the evidence, conflict in the evidence, or the lack of evidence.”  Whether these instructions actually help a jury understand its responsibility, however, remains up for debate.

Consult an Orlando criminal defense attorney

If you or a loved one have been charged with a crime, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney working on your side to protect your rights.  The skilled criminal defense lawyers of The Baez Law Firm have successfully represented clients in Orlando, Tampa, Miami and throughout the state of Florida.  Contact us today for a free consultation about your case.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
Miami Office

Miami Office

40 SW 13th St, Suite 901
Miami, FL 33130
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando Office

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2017 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab