Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

11th Circuit Weighs Whether To Keep Injunction In Place Allowing Ex-Felons To Vote In Spite Of Owing Financial Debt


The fight for voting rights to be restored to ex-felons pursuant to what the voters of Florida passed via Amendment 4 returned to the courts as the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was recently asked to set aside the temporary injunction placed on legislation passed by Republicans mandating that they pay any fines before being able to vote. This is because a federal judge in Tallahassee agreed that imposing the debt requirement amounted to a poll tax in October and granted the temporary injunction. Led by Governor Ron DeSantis, Florida Republicans are now once again arguing that only those ex-felons who have paid all of their fines and financial obligations should regain the right to vote and are asking for the injunction to be dissolved.

The case will be tremendously consequential because of margins that often decide elections in Florida, a battleground state. It is estimated that 1.6 million felons who have completed their prison sentences earned voting privileges under Amendment 4. However, an estimated 80 percent of the state’s felons would once again become ineligible to vote if DeSantis’ legislation is allowed to stand. This is because hundreds of millions of dollars in fines are owed across the state, including almost $300 in Miami-Dade County alone. While the 11th circuit will now decide whether the temporary injunction on DeSantis’ legislation stands, a full trial on the issue is expected in April. Unfortunately, earlier in January, the Florida Supreme Court agreed with Gov. DeSantis in issuing its non-binding advisory opinion.

11th Circuit Appears Skeptical of State’s Argument

During arguments, while the three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit reportedly asked tough questions of both sides, the judges seemed especially skeptical of the state’s arguments. In particular, one senior judge asked the state attorney about a hypothetical situation where two people who were convicted of the same crimes and sentenced to the same punishment; but where only one could afford to pay their fines would have their voting rights restored, while the other would not, and would therefore remain unable to vote.

How Is This Affecting Registration Now?

According to reports, the law allows the courts to modify the original criminal sentences to no longer require completion of things that were originally required, such as fines or community service. As a result, implementation is playing out very differently across the state depending upon party lines in different counties; for example, in Democratic counties, more people are getting their voting rights back, and in Republican counties, voters appear to be having a more difficult time doing so.

Contact Our Florida Civil Rights Lawyers for Assistance

The right to vote and the right to have your vote as a citizen of Florida honored constitute crucial civil rights. If you live in Florida and feel that your civil rights have been violated, The Baez Law Firm will work to ensure that they are defended and restored, and that you are compensated for any harm done to you. Contact our Orlando civil rights attorneys today to find out more about your options.



By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation