Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

Florida Misses Opportunity to Take Meaningful Steps Towards Criminal Justice Reform


In May, unfortunately, Florida missed out on a huge opportunity to enact significant criminal justice reform. Instead of passing Senate Bill 642–which would have reversed the mass incarceration policies that began throughout the state in the mid-1980s as a result of the state legislature imposing minimum mandatory sentencing for nonviolent drug crimes–unfortunately, the state Senate had to accept much weaker house bill, or face nothing whatsoever passing.

The History Of Florida’s Crowded Prisons

In 1994, the Florida Legislature required all inmates to serve 85 percent of their sentences, resulting in a system with hundreds of thousands of inmates and a corrections budget of more than 2.5 billion dollars. This is still the case, even though other states have made significant amount of progress demonstrating that releasing certain nonviolent inmates does not compromise public safety.

Scare Tactics Versus Reality

While the Senate Bill would have allowed judges to depart from the minimum mandatory sentences for nonviolent drug offenders and reduced that 85 percent sentence threshold to 65 percent, House leaders, Governor Ron DeSantis, the Florida Sheriffs Association, and the Florida Prosecuting Attorneys Association reportedly used scare tactics to argue that the Senate bill, if passed, would reverse Florida’s decrease in crime and provide a “get out of jail free card” for criminals that law-enforcement worked hard to get off the streets.

However, nothing could be farther from the truth: for example, reducing the sentence of someone who is serving 36 months to 65 percent would simply reduce their sentence by seven months. In addition, nonviolent offenders who do not go to prison would still be subject to state supervision and incarceration if they violated a judge’s order. In addition—for those concerned about how much money is spent on corrections in general here in Florida—these offenders would not require prison space, which could save around $30 million per year.

So What Was Accomplished?

It is important to acknowledge that the House bill does represent some progress and at least provide for ex-felons to more easily be able to obtain occupational licenses, as well as reduce the number of juveniles who are sentenced as adults, there is no question that it does not go far enough. For example, the felony threshold for theft has now only been raised to $750, even though inflation alone has far surpassed this amount being significant enough to warrant charging as a felony.

Contact Our Florida Criminal Defense Attorneys

Florida has not gone far enough to enact meaningful reform when it comes to how it charges and treats criminal defendants. If you have been accused of a crime, contact our experienced Miami &  Orlando criminal defense attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation