Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Florida Supreme Court Rules That Previous Decision Mandating Unanimous Jury for Death Penalty Was Wrong

shutterstock_141950806

A Florida Supreme Court ruling in late January finding that the Court erred in 2016 when it ruled that a jury must be unanimous in sentencing a defendant to death has now placed a number of death penalty cases in legal limbo. Specifically, the majority opinion said that the state Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment does not require a unanimous jury recommendation, or any jury recommendation, before a death sentence can be imposed. Criminal justice advocates are now trying to determine what this means for existing cases and resentencing, as well as the myriad of serious constitutional issues for the cases for which relief is potentially being removed.

Since the 2016 ruling, almost 150 death row inmates who had been sentenced to death with non-unanimous jury decisions were granted new sentencing hearings, and it is now unclear as to whether they will be subject to another round of sentencing. Those who have already been re-sentenced to life in prison likely cannot be resentenced, as there is a very strong argument that this would be ex post facto law, which is unconstitutional. In addition, under the current law, defendants still require a unanimous jury decision to receive the death penalty.

The Effect Of The 2016 Decision

The 2016 decision came out of the finding that the judge had too much weight in the decision. As a result, executions were halted for months while the legislature attempted to address the issue and state Supreme Court weighed in as well. In 2017, the law was then changed to acquire a unanimous jury decision. A number of death penalty cases were returned to trial court for new sentences, while some prosecutors simply agreed to sentences of life without parole in order to avoid new sentencing hearings.

A Social Justice Issue

Many have also pointed out that this decision returns Florida to the status is an outlier among the jurisdictions in the country that do not require unanimous jury decision to impose the death penalty. Alabama is the only other state that does not require a unanimous jury decision to do so. There is a significant amount of evidence indicating that both racial disparities and wrongful convictions apply when it comes to the death penalty, which indicates that requiring a unanimous jury is fundamental to ensuring fairness.

Consult an Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney

If you are facing any kind of criminal charges, whether capital or not, your best option is to secure the assistance of the best criminal defense attorney in Florida. The dedicated team of Orlando criminal defense attorneys at The Baez Law Firm has defended all types of cases throughout the state of Florida. We are dedicated to securing the best outcome for your case. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

 

Resource:

winknews.com/2020/01/25/florida-death-penalty-experts-concerned-about-supreme-court-ruling/

floridianpress.com/2020/01/juice-florida-politics-juicy-read-1-24-20-unprecedented-move-by-trump-in-miami-fl-death-penalty-ruling-shelved/

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/florida-advocates-once-again-seek-to-expand-what-is-punished-as-a-hate-crime/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2020 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab