Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

The Government Is Using Foreign Intelligence Spying Powers to More Easily Wiretap U.S. Citizens in Regular Criminal Investigations

shutterstock_1506802511

A fraud prosecution case that is currently underway highlights a disturbing trend that involves the government abusing its flexible surveillance powers – which were provided in order to capture foreign spies in the U.S. – to wiretap regular citizens as part of regular criminal prosecutions – often for fraud – that have nothing to do with national security or foreign intelligence.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

More than 40 years ago, Congress provided these surveillance powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to request to wiretap individuals from a special court without first having to establish probable cause, a requirement for wiretapping in all other criminal investigation contexts. Congress presumably assumed that these relaxed standards were necessary for issues related to national security, which sometimes involve time-sensitive, dangerous contexts.

Fourth Amendment & Privacy Concerns

However, the government is now, instead, relying on FISA to deploy intrusive surveillance techniques in the absence of any link to foreign intelligence issues, which implicates the Fourth Amendment and privacy rights of countless Americans who have never even been suspected of committing any crimes.

Due Process Concerns

Yet what is perhaps worse, those charged under FISA are also unable to learn anything that would help them challenge this controversial surveillance, facing tremendous hurdles in exercising their due process rights and holding the government accountable. While criminal defendants normally have the right to review the government’s application to wiretap them in order to challenge any omissions or errors as part of their due process rights, when it comes to FISA, even in regular criminal prosecutions, this is not the case. In fact, in the 40 years that FISA has been around, no defendant has ever been able to review a government’s FISA application.

The Department of Justice Inspector General recently put together a report on FISA abuses which demonstrates why this is a problem. The report examines the number of mistakes and omissions just in the FISA applications to surveil a former Trump campaign advisor. In addition, in 2000, the government itself confessed to omissions and misstatements of material facts involved in 75 surveillance applications it submitted to the FISA court, all involving people targeted for surveillance.

If You Are Charged with A Crime, You Want to Work with The Very Best in Legal Representation

Courts must provide defendants with access to any and all materials that are consistent with their due process rights. If you have been charged with a federal or state crime, contact our Orlando criminal lawyers at the Baez Law Firm to schedule a free case consultation. We are experienced in a wide range of practice areas, and have received national recognition for our superior legal services.

 

Resource:

fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/fisc051702.pdf#page=16

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/13/inspector-generals-report-makes-it-clear-we-need-reform-governments-secret-intelligence-court/

aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/the-government-is-using-its-foreign-intelligence-spying-powers-for-routine-domestic-investigations/

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/florida-is-once-again-retrying-a-defendant-who-has-already-been-exonerated-by-dna-evidence-what-does-this-say-about-our-justice-system/

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation