Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

The Increasing Discrepancies Between Resources Available to Public Defenders & Prosecutors Highlights Severe Injustice

shutterstock_389932720

The New York Times recently ran an important piece on the fact that public defenders frequently lack access to gadgets and software that make all the difference in terms of keeping their clients out of jail. In the criminal justice system, citizens who are accused of crimes are supposed to have an advantage because the burden of proof is on the prosecution and state. However, in practice, this is not always the case: even though the government must turn over all evidence to the defense, investigators can compel testimony, issue subpoenas, and pressure defendants into taking guilty pleas.

Access to The Latest Technology Is Far from Equal

Prosecutors also have an advantage when it comes to technology: While law-enforcement can use court orders and warrants to compel companies to turn over communication such as emails and photos, defense attorneys cannot. Prosecutors also have access to forensic technology, which makes their investigations much easier; particularly when it comes to extracting data from smart phones. In order to successfully defend a client, defense attorneys must have access to the same tools that the police do, including forensic devices and software–expensive technology that captures formats that can hold up in court. These devices can not only capture emails and text messages, but also material that has been deleted. Ultimately, this is necessary in order to reconstruct defendants’ movements in order to prove their innocence.

Overall, there is no question that it is an uneven playing field; where there has been an inadequate amount of scrutiny of these new techniques that law-enforcement has access to solve their cases. It is a constant game of playing catch-up, with law-enforcement gaining access to new investigative techniques, and those representing the accused struggling to catch up. While a number of forensics companies are willing to sell to defense attorneys, some companies actually are not, deciding that they are limiting sales distributions to local, state, and federal government law-enforcement users only.

Public defenders are also often turned down by companies such as Facebook and Google, who, at the same time, provide the state’s attorney and police with all of the information they need, and insist on defenders obtaining warrants, even though that’s impossible. The subpoenas that defenders can get are then often ignored by these companies.

Our Criminal Defense Attorneys Are the Very Best: Contact Us to Find Out More

This is yet another reason why it can be difficult for public defenders to provide defendants with the same quality level of representation as private defense attorneys. Not only are there fewer resources for the accused, but those resources that are available are sometimes impossible to rely on.

When it comes to being accused of a crime, you do not want to gamble with your future. Contact our Orlando criminal attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out more about our noteworthy criminal defense services.

 

Resource:

nytimes.com/2019/11/22/business/law-enforcement-public-defender-technology-gap.html

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/the-time-is-now-for-florida-other-states-to-protect-citizens-against-an-intrusion-of-our-rights-by-facial-recognition-technology/

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #620
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2020 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab