Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

What Are Considered “Mitigating Factors” In Florida Criminal Sentencing?


Every criminal offense in Florida carries a minimum permissible sentence. But a judge can take into account certain “mitigating circumstances” and impose a sentence beyond the statutory minimum. For example, if the defendant negotiates a plea bargain with the prosecution for a lower sentence, the court can accept that. Another common ground for granting a downward departure in sentencing is that the victim in the case “was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident.”

Judge Rejects Minor’s “Consent” as a Leniency Factor in Sentencing Statutory Rape Defendant

When deciding whether to apply a downward departure, Florida courts must conduct a two-step first process. The first step is to determine whether a valid legal and factual basis exists for the departure–i.e., does it fall within any of the statutory mitigation factors listed. If this first step is satisfied, the trial judge must then decide if the case before them is appropriate for a downward departure.

This second step is an exercise of discretion. In other words, even if the defendant proves a mitigating factor was present, that does not require the judge to issue a below-minimum sentence. The judge always retains the discretion to hold a departure is not appropriate. An appellate court will typically not second-guess the judge’s exercise of discretion unless there is clear evidence of abuse.

A recent decision from the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals, Watson v. State, provides an illustration. This was a statutory rape case. The defendant, who was 25 years old at the time, had a sexual relationship with his 15-year-old stepsister, which resulted in her pregnancy. Florida prosecutors subsequently charged the defendant with third-degree felony child abuse.

The defendant agreed to plead guilty. At sentencing, he argued for a downward departure based on the mitigating factor that the victim had “voluntarily engaged in the sexual relationship” and told the court she did not want the defendant to go to jail. The judge found this mitigating factor to be inadequate and proceeded to sentence the defendant to 81.15 months in jail, which was within Florida’s statutory guidelines.

On appeal, the defendant argued the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to consider the victim’s “consent.” The Fifth District disagreed and upheld the sentence. The appellate court did note that “while a minor’s consent is not a defense to crimes of a sexual nature, a trial court may impose a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines under such circumstances.” That is, nothing in the law prohibits taking a minor’s initiation of a sexual relationship with an adult into account when the latter is sentenced for statutory rape. But a judge is not required to do so. And in this case, the Fifth District said the trial court acted within the bounds of its discretion by denying the defendant’s “taking advantage of the victim’s consent was not appropriate under the circumstances.”

Contact Florida Criminal Defense Attorney Jose Baez Today

If you are facing any sex crimes charges it is important that you receive timely and accurate legal advice from a qualified Orlando criminal attorney. Contact the Baez Law Firm today to speak with a lawyer right away.



  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab