Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

A Look at Questionable Living Conditions & Constitutional Issues on Florida’s Death Row & National Scale


In November, a number of important news outlets, reports, and decisions were made that expose the unconstitutional conditions in which those given death sentences endure, including a reliance on unconstitutional sentencing procedures and questionable living conditions and practices, as we discuss below:

 Tampa Bay Times Provides Video Glimpse into Florida Death Row Conditions

We’ve discussed various issues with the death penalty before, in particular, Florida’s death penalty law and system. Since 1999, 51 people have died by lethal injection here, and 345 people are currently awaiting execution. The prison conditions for those awaiting the death penalty here in Florida—including a video tour documenting how they live—were recently the subject of a Tampa Bay Times expose.  Inmates spend an average of 23 hours per day in a cell that includes a locker, mattress, sink, small table, and toilet. Inmates’ time there ranges between 12 and 30 years, and is currently the subject of an ongoing federal lawsuit because a number of inmates who’ve been there for years describe it as “permanent solitary confinement.”

New Report Questions Illegal Practices Surrounding National Death Penalty Practices

In late November, the Death Penalty Information Center also released a new report examining the questionable practices kept from public view and the secrecy surrounding the death penalty throughout the U.S. The report describes a number of questionable practices, including but not limited to states using privacy laws to conceal breaking federal and state laws and engaging in contracts and business dealings with questionable drug suppliers. As a result, more and more executions are botched each year, especially those involving midazolam. Perhaps most importantly, the report describes how these conditions violate the Constitution’s ban on cruel or unusual punishment.

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Florida Death Penalty Cases

In another step back from progress for Florida, in late November, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review several Florida cases involving death sentences imposed with unconstitutional sentencing procedures. Even though the Supreme Court found that Florida’s sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendment because judges–rather than juries–were engaged in fact finding, a number of cases in which death sentences were unconstitutionally imposed still remain unreviewed. These cases include important issues such as defendants enduring unconscionable long delays while on death row, as well as whether the Eighth Amendment mandates that juries, rather than judges, decide on death sentencing.

Contact Our Experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys

Whether you are facing capital or other criminal charges and penalties here in Florida, working with the right criminal defense attorney can make the difference between life and death. At the Baez Law Firm, we have defended those charged in a number of capital cases, and provide the very best in criminal defense representation. Contact us at the Baez Law Firm today to set up a consultation and find out more.





  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab