Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

An Unusual Civil Rights Issue We Now Face: Police Officers Making False Arrests to Earn Overtime

Police1

On February 19th, the New York Times covered a story involving police officers who stand accused of making false arrests in order to increase their incomes (a practice known as “collars for dollars”). The implications of the federal trial brought against them could have far-reaching impacts on criminal defendants affected by these officers, as well as others, as scrutiny in general falls on police activity and arrests in general.

Specifically, these officers will appear in Federal District Court this month (February) for an unusual civil rights trial involving accusations that they detained an individual simply to accrue overtime pay. If the officers are found liable, another trial will be scheduled which would arguably challenge policing practices all over the country; in particular, the question of whether police officers habitually use false arrests in order to bolster their pay.

“Collars for Dollars”: 1980s to the Present

This isn’t the first time concern over the practice known as “collars for dollars” has come up: The 1994 “Mollen Commission” report detailed numerous overtime schemes that were explicitly used by the City of New York’s police force. The report described police officers frequently involving as many police officers as possible in making an arrest in order to maximize those eligible for overtime, as well as claiming to discover evidence that would require them to enter the case as peripheral witnesses so that they would have to be on-hand or available to testify—and thus receive more overtime pay. It also described officers specifically directing arrests to the members who stood to gain the most overtime, even sending an officer into court to testify about events they never witnessed, just to receive the extra pay for going to court on their day off.

Unfortunately, this story doesn’t just involve police officers taking advantage of taxpayer dollars; it involves making arrests (illegal arrests) of and bringing false charges against innocent people, who are then sent to jail for these accusations. This occurred in the 1980s in the infamous “Morgue Boys” case, and it occurred just recently, in January 2018, when a Queens detective (Kevin Desormeau) was found to have illegally arrested an innocent man under false drug charges; falsely claiming that he (Desormeau) personally witnessed the suspect dealing drugs; in order to file for overtime.

Criminal Defense Attorneys Who Do Not Accept Police Misconduct

Clearly, years of education and attempted reform have only had marginal effects on decreasing false arrests for the sake of overtime. You might be surprised at how frequently police misconduct is involved in criminal accusations.

If you have been wrongfully accused of a crime, we will do everything we can to unearth any suspicious activity on the part of police authorities, and ensure that you receive justice. Contact our experienced Florida and Massachusetts criminal defense attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out more.

Resources:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/19/nyregion/new-york-police-overtime-pay-trial.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

https://www.scribd.com/document/248581606/1994-07-07-Mollen-Commission-NYPD-Report

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

40 SW 13th St, Suite 901
Miami, FL 33130
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2018 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab