Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Case Against Robert Kraft Continues to Highlight Battle Involving Police Use of Secret Cameras Versus Individual Privacy Rights

shutterstock_256858591

The previous trial involving sex crime charges against Robert Kraft an others in connect with massage parlors led to the judge throwing out video surveillance that police had gathered because police failed to obtain a lawful warrant (known as a “sneak-and-peak”) to only specifically gather evidence of illegal activity. According to reports, surveillance cameras ran continuously for five days at the spa, leading the judge to find that both police and the judge who granted the warrant did not do enough to minimize privacy invasions of other customers who engaged in legal activities there.

However, prosecutors with the state of Florida have now announced that they still plan to try Kraft with felony charges; a rare decision after Kraft initially only faced misdemeanor charges. Even though the judge found the warrant flawed because the surveillance was not solely focused on the criminal acts occurring,  prosecutors are appealing the judge’s ruling throwing out the evidence. Because purchasing a prostitute is technically a felony in the state of Florida, Kraft could very well be tried for a third degree felony and, if found guilty, could spend up to five years in prison.

Deal Offered

Although there is no evidence of human trafficking in association with the facility that Kraft was seen engaging in sexual acts for money in, prosecutors offered to drop the original charges if he entered a diversion program, made an admission that he was guilty, pay a $5,000 fine, perform 100 hours of community service, and attend a class on the dangers of prostitution and its connection to human trafficking.

Kraft Sues State Attorney’s Office Over Florida Public Records Laws

Meanwhile, Kraft’s attorneys are now suing the State Attorney’s Office in Palm Beach County alleging neglect of public records laws by withholding a number of requested documents that must be turned over in accordance with the law. According to the lawsuit, the police department provided portions of email exchanges with the State Attorney’s Office, while the State Attorney’s Office only turned over records already produced in discovery in the criminal case.

If You Are Facing Charges in Florida, Contact The Very Best in Criminal Defense

This case is an important one which reflects a kind of constitutional test, putting police powers and the use of secret cameras against privacy rights.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense in Florida, the smartest thing you can do is retain aggressive, knowledgeable criminal defense attorneys who can ensure the best possible outcome for your case, including ensuring that any illegally-gathered evidence is thrown out. Contact our Orlando criminal defense lawyers at the Baez Law Firm right away to schedule your free consultation.

Resource:

si.com/nfl/patriots/news/kraft-could-face-felony-charge-jupiter-spa

boston.cbslocal.com/2019/12/28/robert-kraft-prostitution-charges-florida-spa-patriots/

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/the-u-s-supreme-court-will-hear-a-case-that-in-instrumental-in-our-fourth-amendment-rights-staying-protected/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2020 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab