Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

Civil Rights Concerns Exacerbated After Local Police Provided With Military-Grade Weapons


On August 28, President Trump signed an order mandating that the U.S. military provide access to grenade launchers, high-caliber weapons, and other military gear to local police departments, igniting concerns from civil rights groups when it comes to police officers violating the public’s constitutional rights.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also been steadily increasing tough-on-crime policies and reshaping the way the Justice Department addresses civil rights, making advocates extremely nervous. Many are concerned that this administration is taking too many steps to militarize the local police, which will only encourage and escalate violent confrontations between police and the public.

History of Surplus Equipment Program

Police should arguably be trained in effective ways to serve and protect the public, but not be provided local police with military-grade weapons. The program allowing police to receive surplus equipment was originally authorized in 1990, but was sharply curtailed by the last administration in 2015 after several instances of abusive, police brutality; specifically, after police inappropriately responded in riot gear and deployed dogs, armored vehicles, assault rifles, and tear gas during protests in Ferguson following the death of Michael Brown. President Obama’s order specifically prohibited the government from providing tracked armored vehicles, weaponized aircraft, grenade launchers, bayonets, and firearms/ammunition .50-caliber or more to police.

Administration Striking At Civil Rights

Conversely, Trump’s order will effectively allow local agencies to set their own rules when it comes to using this equipment.

However, some localities have already taken steps to limit what police can and cannot do when it comes to military-grade weapons like these, and these restrictions will remain in place in spite of the order.

Sessions has also announced that he intends to pull back on court-enforced plans to resolve issues related to pervasive civil rights violations. He has already revived a form of asset forfeiture which allows local police to use federal assistance in seizing property and cash associated with those accused of crimes (even if they are never charged or convicted of the crime). In response, one Appeals Court already struck down previous rulings allowing the government to seize untainted property (i.e. property that is not connected to the alleged crime) pre-trial; specifically rejecting the government’s argument that interfering with a defendant’s property under the “substitute property” clause does not harm their Sixth Amendment rights.

Civil Rights Attorneys Serving Florida and Massachusetts

As a Florida citizen, you are guaranteed certain constitutional rights. When these rights are violated, speaking with an experienced civil rights and criminal defense attorney is in your best interest.

At the Baez Law Firm, we work tirelessly to ensure that your rights are and that you are compensated for any harm you experience. Contact our Florida and Massachusetts civil rights lawyers today to find out how we can help.





  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab