Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Experts Hypothesize That Federal Judges May Rethink Sentencing in The Future After Dismaying Experiences with Bureau of Prisons During Pandemic

shutterstock_673565005

Experts have speculated that federal judges having to deal with the Federal Bureau of Prisons up close may permanently affect how they approach sentencing in the future, and while judges have limited control over the release of inmates, they have significant discretion when it comes to the length of incarceration. It will largely be left up to judges to take a common sense approach to tackling the issue of prison overpopulation, which presents a very ‘clear and present danger’ when it comes to inmates and those who work in the prisons. They could be the “saving grace” when it comes to reducing prison populations, and there is no question that, post-pandemic, they will re-think sentencing. The backlog that has built up in the courts and the motions currently filed just related to civil rights concerns, compassionate release, and pre-trial pre-sentencing release are vast and overwhelming, and could very well inspire a new kind of criminal justice reform.

What The CARES Act Provided to Inmates

The CARES Act, in part, allowed Attorney General Barr to direct the Bureau of Prisons to use Home Confinement as a means of allowing for social distancing within federal prisons in order to reduce inmate population and allow for inmates that are especially vulnerable to COVID-19 to be released. Because the Bureau already had a system in place allowing for certain individuals to serve out the rest of their sentence in Home Confinement, what the Act did was essentially allow it to expand its policy and extend the ability for individuals to be released into Home Confinement.

Federal Bureau of Prisons Promises Inmates Consideration of Home Confinement, Then Reneges

However, instead, the Bureau created a complicated, confusing list-based system, whereby a number of inmates who already had release plans, as well as those who had more than one year remaining, were notified that they would be considered for Home Confinement, and then were told, in late April, that they were no longer eligible because they had not served 50 percent of their sentence. This included those on the list seeking compassionate release due to their age and health.

In sum, it has become clear that, while the CARES Act provides the Bureau with the ability to send anyone home to Home Confinement no matter how long their sentence is, it is only prioritizing inmates who have served 50 percent of more of their sentence or who have 18 months or less remaining and have served 25 percent or more of their sentence, regardless of how vulnerable a given inmate is to COVID-19 due to their age and/or health.  As a result, people who were told that they were being released, who have not seen their families in over one month – many of whom have serious health conditions and are susceptible to COVID-19 – have now been told that they will not be going into Home Confinement or seeing their loved ones.

Strain Placed On Judicial System

And the inmates are not the only ones negatively affected by these actions: The judicial system has been overloaded with accompanying Compassionate Release motions that have wasted judges’ time, all when the Bureau could have simply released vulnerable inmates pursuant to its authority under the Act.  In addition, there are now questions surrounding whether there ever was a list to begin with.

If You Have Any Questions or Concerns, Contact Our Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys

If your civil rights have been violated in a federal prison and/or in association with the Federal Bureau of Prisons, contact one of our Orlando criminal defense attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help.

 

Resource:

forbes.com/sites/walterpavlo/2020/04/24/the-federal-bureau-of-prisons-list-has-caused-confusion-in-courts-and-prisons/#734e2f9537d4

forbes.com/sites/walterpavlo/2020/05/03/after-seeing-federal-bureau-of-prisons-up-close-federal-judges-may-see-sentencing-differently-in-future/#18a788983f2b

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/floridas-proposal-to-create-a-prison-within-a-prison-during-pandemic-arguably-violates-prisoners-eighth-amendment-rights/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2020 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab