Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Florida Appeals Court Sides with Defendant in Finding That He Does Not Need to Turn Over Phone’s Passcode in Response to Warrant

CellAccident

In a groundbreaking court case decision out of the Florida appeals court, the court recently sided with a criminal defendant in deciding that he did not have to turn over his cell phone passcode to police. The decision came out of the 1st District Court of Appeal in Alachua County in a robbery case after two other state appellate courts came to different conclusions.

The Case

In the case, the police obtained a warrant to take the defendant’s iPhone from his car. In doing so, they sought to access broad amounts of encrypted information, including a history of calls and texts, pictures, information from the apps, and other information from the phone. While the circuit court ordered the defendant to turn over the passcode, the appeals court overturned the decision, relying on the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination.

In doing so, the majority agreed with the previous decision out of Florida’s 4th District Court of Appeal, which found that, unless the state can describe “with reasonable particularity” the information it seeks to access, an attempt to seek all communication, images, and data amounts to a “mere fishing expedition.” In other words, this kind of request is far too broad to be permitted under the U.S. Constitution, and is based on a generalized belief that criminal enterprises operate via electronic communications that leave a digital trail, which falls short of the “reasonable particularly” standard.

Courts “Struggling to Find Common Legal Ground”

This is currently a controversial issue, with some describing it as a challenge to a number of courts around the country that are “struggling to find common legal ground” when it comes to the issue. Thus far, Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal—which hears cases in Southwest Florida—took the opposite approach, and has set precedent ordering defendants to turn over passcodes.

In fact, in other jurisdictions, some suspects have been held in criminal contempt and sentenced to prison for refusing to reveal their phone’s passcode; even after swearing, under oath, that they had provided the password already. In some cases, defendants have claimed that they cannot recall the password. In one such case, a Miami-Dade Circuit Judge held that there was no way to prove that the defendant remembered the code more than 10 months after they were arrested.

If You Have Been Accused of a Crime, Contact Our Florida Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys

If you have been arrested for a crime, contact our experienced Orlando & Miami criminal attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help and ensure that any evidence that has been illegally obtained against you cannot be used at trial.

Resources:

news.wjct.org/post/florida-appeals-court-sides-defendant-iphone-passcode

digitaltrends.com/mobile/florida-court-phone-passwords/

floridapolitics.com/archives/299312-court-sides-with-defendant-on-iphone-passcode

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #620
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2019 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab