Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

Florida Appeals Court Sides with Defendant in Finding That He Does Not Need to Turn Over Phone’s Passcode in Response to Warrant


In a groundbreaking court case decision out of the Florida appeals court, the court recently sided with a criminal defendant in deciding that he did not have to turn over his cell phone passcode to police. The decision came out of the 1st District Court of Appeal in Alachua County in a robbery case after two other state appellate courts came to different conclusions.

The Case

In the case, the police obtained a warrant to take the defendant’s iPhone from his car. In doing so, they sought to access broad amounts of encrypted information, including a history of calls and texts, pictures, information from the apps, and other information from the phone. While the circuit court ordered the defendant to turn over the passcode, the appeals court overturned the decision, relying on the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination.

In doing so, the majority agreed with the previous decision out of Florida’s 4th District Court of Appeal, which found that, unless the state can describe “with reasonable particularity” the information it seeks to access, an attempt to seek all communication, images, and data amounts to a “mere fishing expedition.” In other words, this kind of request is far too broad to be permitted under the U.S. Constitution, and is based on a generalized belief that criminal enterprises operate via electronic communications that leave a digital trail, which falls short of the “reasonable particularly” standard.

Courts “Struggling to Find Common Legal Ground”

This is currently a controversial issue, with some describing it as a challenge to a number of courts around the country that are “struggling to find common legal ground” when it comes to the issue. Thus far, Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal—which hears cases in Southwest Florida—took the opposite approach, and has set precedent ordering defendants to turn over passcodes.

In fact, in other jurisdictions, some suspects have been held in criminal contempt and sentenced to prison for refusing to reveal their phone’s passcode; even after swearing, under oath, that they had provided the password already. In some cases, defendants have claimed that they cannot recall the password. In one such case, a Miami-Dade Circuit Judge held that there was no way to prove that the defendant remembered the code more than 10 months after they were arrested.

If You Have Been Accused of a Crime, Contact Our Florida Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys

If you have been arrested for a crime, contact our experienced Orlando & Miami criminal attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help and ensure that any evidence that has been illegally obtained against you cannot be used at trial.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation