Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

Florida Court Dismisses Criminal Charges Against Seven Doctors In Long-Standing “Pill Mill” Case


On February 22nd, 2024, Treasure Coast News reported that a Florida court had dismissed criminal charges against seven doctors. The physicians—along with several business executives—were facing allegations as part of a more than decade-long “pill mill” case. Here, our Orlando criminal defense attorney provides an overview of the allegations and the court decision.

Background: Massive 2012 “Pill Mill” Scandal Hit Medical Practices and Clinics in Florida 

There has been a long-standing legal issue involving an alleged “Pill Mill” in Florida. Pill mill is a pejorative term used to describe a clinic or operation that prescribes or dispenses powerful narcotics with little to no legitimate medical oversight. In other words, they are medical clinics that give out prescriptions far too easily—often to “patients” who are wholly unfit to receive medication.

The case centers around Operation Pill Street Blues— a law enforcement effort aimed at tackling prescription drug abuse in Florida. The operation led to the raid and subsequent closure of several pain clinics across Florida, including the Stuart Pain Management Center in Vero Beach, which was identified as a significant player in the distribution of an estimated 2 million pills a year. 

Allegations: Doctors Knowingly Wrote Unnecessary Prescriptions for Financial Gain 

In 2012, major raids were conducted as part of Operation Pill Street Blues, including on the Stuart Pain Management Center. As a consequence, fourteen people—including seven doctors and seven clinic owners—were arrested and charged with serious felony offenses. The charges ranged from racketeering to manslaughter. The pills in question were largely opioids. Notably, the criminal proceedings against the defendants, including all seven doctors, were delayed. The matter was delayed for a variety of reasons—from appeals to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Case Dismissed: The Right to a Speedy Trial Was Violated 

Judge Robert Meadows of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida dismissed the charges against the doctors. As stated by the judge, the criminal charges have been dismissed based on the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Sixth Amendment protects a defendant’s right to a speedy trial. In rendering the verdict, Judge Meadows criticized the prosecution for repeated delays. THe judge noted that many of the delays in the criminal case were primarily due to their failure to provide discovery material to the defendants. Judge Meadows deemed the discovery violation as “beyond mere negligence” and indicative of deliberate impediment of the judicial process. The matter may not be over yet. Despite the dismissal, the Florida Prosecutor expressed intentions to request a reconsideration of Judge Meadows’ ruling, 

Contact Our Orlando Criminal Defense Lawyer for Doctors Today

At The Baez Law Firm, our Orlando criminal defense attorney has the skills, experience, and legal expertise to represent doctors. Charged with any type of criminal offense? We are here as a resource. Call us now or connect with us online for a fully private, no obligation case assessment. With an office in Orlando, we provide criminal defense services to physicians across Central Florida.



  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab