Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Florida Man Wrongfully Arrested Over Doughnut Glaze Highlights Problems with Roadside Drug Tests

Defense4

It’s not a headline you see every day: Florida police mistaking doughnut glaze in a car for crystal methamphetamine and wrongfully arresting the car’s owner. As a result of the incident, the man received a $37,500 settlement from the city of Orlando in mid-October.

Yet perhaps most shockingly, the roadside drug tests were positive when the substance was tested as an illegal substance. However, a state crime lab later cleared the suspect.

What does this say about the roadside drug tests and their accuracy? Should police officers be arresting people based on the results of these field tests when it takes a second test by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to prove that a substance is sugar and not meth?

Unreliable Results & Permanent Damage

Orlando police are now reportedly training more than 730 officers on how to properly use these roadside tests; shouldn’t they just abandon the tests altogether? Although the man who was wrongfully arrested did receive a settlement, he is still facing employment-related issues due to online sources indicating that he has been arrested, and will need to work on getting his record expunged. He also spent 10 hours in jail and had to post a $2,500 bond.

These field tests work via the officer simply dropping the substance in question taken from the suspect’s person or car floorboards into a pouch of chemicals and watching for a change in color to result. Does this seem perhaps too simple?

Unfortunately, yes; the problem being that legal substances sometimes create the same colors as the illegal ones. In addition, there are ample opportunities for the officers to misinterpret the results.

And yet, these faulty police drug kits are used in thousands of convictions and in securing guilty pleas every year, even when crime labs express a desire to replace them. In fact, it was such a problem that in 2014, the Las Vegas police department submitted a report to the U.S. Department of Justice detailing just how prevalent false positives were with the tests. Still, just in one city (Las Vegas), today, nearly three-quarters of drug convictions rely on field test results, in spite of this report.

Cities in Florida clearly have a similar problem; and yet, there is absolutely no way to figure out how many times these tests were wrong or how many innocent people wrongfully plead guilty, just based on their results.

Contact Us today for Help

If you have been arrested for a crime in based on a roadside drug test, you need to work with an experienced criminal defense lawyer to prevent this from being used against you. At the Baez Law Firm, we have successfully defended misdemeanor and felony cases throughout Florida ad Massachusetts. Contact our office today to schedule your free case consultation. We are experienced in drawing attention to the inaccurate results these field tests produce, have received national recognition for our superior legal services.

Resources:

news4sanantonio.com/news/nation-world/florida-man-arrested-for-doughnut-glaze-gets-37500

propublica.org/article/unreliable-and-unchallenged

documentcloud.org/documents/2998333-Presumptivefieldtesting-Lvmp-public.html#document/p14/a310110

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
Miami Office

Miami Office

40 SW 13th St, Suite 901
Miami, FL 33130
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando Office

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625
Miami Office

Boston Office

6 Beacon Street, Suite 510
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 800-588-BAEZ
Orlando Office

Massachusetts Office

66 North 2nd Street
New Bedford, MA 02740
Office: 800-588-BAEZ

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2018 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab