Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Florida’s Sex Crime Case Against Kraft & Others Falls Apart Due to Police Failing to Properly Conduct Surveillance So as to Protect Privacy Rights

shutterstock_1144882685

The trial involving Florida bringing a number of sex crime charges against Robert Kraft and others in connection with several massage parlors hit a wall on May 13, when the judge found that hundreds of hours of video surveillance police had gathered and based the case on were inadmissible in court because that surveillance also indiscriminately caught a number of individuals who were engaged in legitimate, legal activities in the massage parlors. Now, the criminal cases against Kraft and others are on “life-support” without the availability of incriminating evidence, and the state is expected to be forced into dropping the cases.

The Importance Of “Minimization Actions” & Privacy

When it comes to collecting evidence like this, police officers are supposed to be trained in knowing how to take “minimization actions,” whereby they ensure that the surveillance that they take only catches criminal activity and does not infringe on other law-abiding citizens’ privacy. This is because there’s an expectation of privacy for both businesses and public citizens.

How This Applies to Gathering Surveillance

Part of the purpose of forcing police officers to get a warrant in the first place is out of a necessity to protect privacy rights. When it comes to cracking down on sex crimes in brothels, police officers typically have to engage in undercover operations, whereby they conduct surveillance from the outside and tap phones–while also sending officers–as opposed to just setting up cameras in these parlors and filming everyone and everything.

Innocent Victims Decide to Sue Florida Police in Response

In this case, there is no question that the judge and others saw the police’s actions as overreach. Now, a number of innocent individuals are also suing the Florida police and prosecutors in federal court; claiming that their privacy was violated because they were filmed at the spa while engaged in completely legal activities (i.e. non-sexual massages). In other words, in attempting to catch people committing crimes, law-enforcement itself committed a number of legal violations. Allegedly illegal activities like those the police set out to monitor must be monitored live; they cannot simply keep the camera rolling; it must be stopped when there is no evidence of criminal behavior occurring. Any case that the state has against Kraft and others at this point would rely on witness cooperation without this key surveillance evidence being admissible in court.

If You Have Been Accused of a Sex Crime in Florida, Contact Our Experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys

If you are facing sex crime charges, contact our experienced Orlando sex crimes attorneys at the Baez Law Firm right away to find out how we can help.

Resource:

bostonherald.com/2019/05/14/robert-kraft-sex-spa-case-in-serious-jeopardy-legal-experts-say/

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/do-floridas-sex-offender-laws-go-too-far/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #620
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2019 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab