Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

Holding Prosecutors Accountable For Misconduct and Wrongful Convictions

Gavel_Cuffs

While there are ways of holding police accountable for misconduct and civil and constitutional violations, it has historically been difficult to do the same when it comes to prosecutorial misconduct, even when that misconduct leads to wrongful conviction, as described in a recent New York Times article.

Federal law does not yet properly address prosecutorial misconduct. Not only are attorneys who work in the district attorney’s office immune from being sued for their mistakes, anyone wrongfully convicted is also prohibited from suing the state unless they can conclusively prove that they are innocent (i.e. it is not enough to have been the vitim of an unfair trial).

The Importance of Municipal Liability

There has been one caveat for victims of prosecutorial misconduct: the ability to sue cities and counties for these mistakes by demonstrating that the mistake was due to an administrative issue and the prosecutors were aware of the problem pattern that gave rise to the mistake and subsequent injustice. Just within the last 10 years, approximately six wrongful lawsuits against the state of New York, for example, have been settled by New York City. And in Brooklyn alone, New York City and the state of New York have already paid more than $40 million to settle lawsuits involving retire detective Louis Scarcella.

However, one recent case could significantly affect this opportunity: A federal judge in New York recently ruled that, according to a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case, any mistakes which arise from the supervision and training of assistant district attorneys are prosecutorial—not administrative—in nature, and thus cities cannot be held accountable for these mistakes. 

Accountability for Prosecutorial Misconduct

This recent decision is of significant concern, as it could not only make it impossible to hold prosecutors responsible for legal or ethical violations, it could also bar those victims of these mistakes from seeking any financial redress. Without the possibility of being held accountable, and a complete lack of municipal liability, there would be no incentive for district attorneys to ensure that they are abiding by the constitution and behaving ethically, as well as ensuring that there are policies and practices in place to promote fair trials instead of those leading to mistakes, misconduct, and wrongful convictions.

The issue is now before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and will be pivotal, marking the first time in almost 20 years that the issue of municipal liability will be considered in court.

Florida and Massachusetts Attorney Fighting Wrongful Convictions

Our criminal justice system is far from perfect, and unfortunately, at times, people are wrongfully convicted for crimes they did not commit.

At The Baez Law Firm, our nationally recognized attorneys excel in helping to overturn wrongful convictions and holding those involved in misconduct responsible. Contact us today to find out how we can help you.

Resource:

nytimes.com/2017/10/08/nyregion/holding-prosecutors-accountable-is-hard-it-could-get-harder.html

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
Miami Office

Miami Office

40 SW 13th St, Suite 901
Miami, FL 33130
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando Office

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625
Miami Office

Boston Office

6 Beacon Street, Suite 510
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 800-588-BAEZ
Orlando Office

Massachusetts Office

66 North 2nd Street
New Bedford, MA 02740
Office: 800-588-BAEZ

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2018 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab