Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

Is “Consent” A Valid Defense To A Federal Sex Trafficking Charge?

ProstituteCar

Sex crimes do not just include direct offenses against individuals, such as sexual assault. It also includes “commercial” activities like child sex trafficking. Federal law states a person is guilty of sex trafficking if they “knowingly recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, or maintain a minor” to engage in any “commercial sexual act.” In simpler terms, it is a federal crime to offer or obtain a child and then use said child to engage in sexual activity in exchange for money or anything else of value.

Florida Defendant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Trafficking Three Women

While minors cannot legally consent to sexual activity, what about adults? If an alleged victim of sex trafficking was over 18 at the time of the alleged offense, can a defendant argue there was consent to perform the commercial sex act? The short answer is “no,” as the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recently explained.

The case before the 11th Circuit, United States v. Williams, involved a defendant convicted of sex trafficking multiple women, most of whom were minors at the time the defendant “recruited” them. According to the evidence presented at the defendant’s trial, he forced the three women to work as prostitutes. As the 11th Circuit described the evidence, the defendant “often threatened to kill the girls or their families if they didn’t obey him.” This continued for more than a decade until one of the women contacted law enforcement.

Eventually, a federal jury in Florida convicted the defendant on five counts of sex trafficking and one count of obstruction. The trial court sentenced the defendant to life in prison and ordered him to pay financial restitution to three of his victims.

One of the defendant’s arguments on appeal was that the trial judge erred in refusing to instruct the jury that “consent or voluntary participation of an adult is a defense to sex trafficking.” Although 2 of the 3 victims were initially minors, all three continued to perform commercial sexual acts into adulthood. The defendant maintained that as adults, the women could “legally consent to commercial sex.”

The 11th Circuit said that argument was without merit. Indeed, the Court noted it had “never recognized consent as a valid defense to sex trafficking.” Nor could the defendant cite an opinion from any other federal appellate court to the contrary. And in any event, the nature of the sex trafficking charge itself required the prosecution to prove the defendant use “force, threats of force, fraud, coercion, or any combination of such” to compel the victim’s actions. It was therefore unnecessary to separately instruct the jury as the defendant requested.

Contact Orlando Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer Jose Baez Today

If you are facing any sort of sex crimes charge, you need to take the matter seriously. Your first call should be to a qualified Orlando criminal defense attorney. Contact the Baez Law Firm today to schedule a free initial consultation with a member of our team.

Source:

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201911972.pdf

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2021 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab