Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

November 6 Florida Election Results, Part I: Amendment 6, Rights Of Crime Victims

Justice3

In this two-part series, we discuss some of the important measures that were passed during the November 6 elections and what this means Floridians’ civil rights. One of those measures was Amendment 6, which creates a bill of rights for crime victims and establishes new requirements for judges. Modeled after California’s Marsy’s Law, the law mandates that prosecutors and law enforcement keep victims’ families informed of what is happening during the prosecution of defendants.

While Florida’s constitution already provides victims with the right to be informed and heard, there was previously a provision indicating that this could only be guaranteed “when these rights do not interfere with the constitutional rights of the accused.” Now, victims of crime have 11 very explicit rights, including the right to be free from intimidation and harassment, protection from the accused, and the right to safety considerations when authorities set bail—as well as others—regardless of effects on the accused. For these reasons, both the League of Women Voters and the Florida chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union opposed it.

Was It Misleading? Does It Violate the Rights of the Accused?

However, a number of individuals are concerned that both the ballot title and summary were misleading to voters; Specifically, that the measure has a significant impact on a defendant’s appeals process and right to a speedy trial but was not explicit about these effects. It would reportedly be difficult to change and adds brief appeals deadlines that are impractical to stay on top of. Some have even gone so far as to claim that the amendment infringed on voters’ rights to exercise a free and meaningful vote.

Second, Completely Unrelated Aspect of Amendment 6 and the Issue of “Logrolling”

The second part of the new law increases the mandatory retirement age for judges from 70 to 75 and requires that hearing officers and judges interpret rules and statutes themselves instead of automatically deferring to government agencies.

In addition to potentially misleading titles and summaries, many are also concerned about “logrolling,” or combining two completely different issues into one amendment. It has become such a concern for some here in Florida that it is currently the subject of an ongoing case brought by retired Supreme Court chief justice Harry Lee Anstead against former Elections commissioner Robert Barnas.

Contact Our Experienced Florida Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys

While Florida’s state constitution does not limit how many subjects CRC amendment can include, some are concerned that Amendment 6 specifically dumps too much additional responsibility onto the justice system as well.

If your rights as a criminal defendant may have been violated, contact the Baez Law Firm today to find out how our experienced criminal defense and civil rights attorneys can help.

Resources:

miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article220678905.html

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/lgbtq-advocates-are-concerned-about-the-administrations-new-civil-rights-probe/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #620
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2019 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab