Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

November 6 Florida Election Results, Part II: Voting Rights & Animal Welfare Laws

shutterstock_466018514

In part II of this series, we address some of the legal changes that were made by voters in the November 6, 2018 elections, and how that affects Floridians and their civil rights. Specifically, on November 6, Florida voters approved Amendment 4, which restores voting rights in the state for individuals previously convicted of some felonies, and also banned greyhound racing throughout the state, as we discuss below.

Amendment 4: Restoring Ex-Felon Voting Rights

Amendment 4 restores voting rights for anyone in the state of Florida convicted of a felony as long as they completed their sentencing unless they were convicted of a felony sex offense or murder. This is expected to affect more than nine percent of the overall voting population in Florida, or approximately 1.5 million people. 

This is expected to have a large impact on communities of color who have been disproportionately targeted by law enforcement. Specifically, as of 2016, more than 400,000 black people (or almost 18 percent of the entire population of black voters in the state) had completed their sentences but still could not vote simply due to previously having a felony record.

Florida was one of only three states currently involved in this practice (alongside Iowa and Kentucky). Restrictions such as these have historically been instituted and justified by relying on the 14th Amendment, which allows the government to “abridge the right to vote due to participation in rebellion or other crime.” Florida’s process of restoring voting rights to ex-felons has long been the subject of controversy and already shot down by some courts. Individuals had to wait sometimes as long as seven years to apply, and the review process was entirely up to a small panel of individuals that included Governor Rick Scott. Since the process was implemented, only an estimated 3,000 out of more than 30,000 had their voting rights restored. As a result, it is projected that Florida had disenfranchised more voters than any other state

Amendment 13: Greyhound Racing Phased Out

Amendment 13, which banned commercial greyhound racing, also passed on November 6. This follows on the heels of other animal welfare laws that went into effect here in Florida as of October 1, which impose harsher penalties for animal abuse, making it more likely that animal offenders go to jail if convicted, increases the severity ranking of these types of crimes in general, and prevents those who have been convicted of animal cruelty crimes from owning pets.

Experienced Florida Civil Rights Attorneys

If you live in Florida and your civil rights—including due process rights—have been violated, contact our experienced civil rights attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help.

Resources:

baezlawfirm.com/new-florida-animal-abuse-law-with-stiffer-penalties-went-into-effect-october-1/

vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/11/6/18052374/florida-amendment-4-felon-voting-rights-results

vox.com/future-perfect/2018/11/7/18071246/midterms-amendment-13-proposition-12-california-florida-animal-welfare

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/november-6-florida-election-results-part-i-amendment-6-rights-of-crime-victims/

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation