Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

Police Need a Warrant to Use Your Cell Phone to Find You

What could law enforcement learn about you from using your cell phone to track your location in real time? All sorts of things – what doctors you go to, what therapists you see, when you visit a lawyer’s office, where you go at night, to name just a few.  The technology to locate your cell phone in your purse or pocket and thereby find you virtually anywhere already exists.  Fortunately, courts are now telling cops that they must get a warrant before using cellular data to track a phone during a criminal investigation.

Law enforcement use of cell site simulators

Law enforcement employs a type of device known as a cell site simulator (also called a Stingray or Hailstorm) that forces a cell phone to transmit signals to it by mimicking a cell tower, thereby revealing the phone’s location.  As reported by the ABA Journal, police in Maryland used a Hailstorm device without a warrant to locate Kerron Andrews, a suspect charged with attempted murder.  The device enabled the police to track Andrews to a residence, where they arrested him.  After his arrest, police obtained a search warrant for the premises and found a gun among the couch cushions.  Andrews argued that use of the Hailstorm without a warrant violated his Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

The Maryland appellate court agreed with Andrews.  (See Maryland v. Andrews decision here.)  The court held that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in real-time cell phone location information, which requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant to use that information unless an established exception to the warrant requirement exists.  No such exception existed in Andrews’s case.  The court went on to find that police were only able to obtain a warrant to search the house because of their unconstitutional use of the cell site simulator, and that therefore the gun turned up in that search was “fruit of the poisonous tree” and could not be used as evidence against Andrews.

What does Florida law say about cell site simulators?

While Florida courts have not addressed this precise question, a 2014 case suggests that they would reach the same conclusion.  An article on Wired.com points out that in 2014 the Florida Supreme Court ruled that obtaining cell phone location data from a telecom provider to track a person’s location or movement in real time constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant. (See Tracey v. Florida, here.)  The main difference between this situation and the Andrews case is that by using a cell site simulator, police can bypass the telecom provider, which does not make the use of location data any less intrusive or less a search.

Consult an Orlando Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you have been arrested in Florida, your need representation from a dedicated criminal defense lawyer familiar with the complexities of Florida’s criminal law.  The experienced lawyers of The Baez Law Firm have represented clients in all types of criminal matters in Orlando, Miami, Tampa, and throughout the state.  We will examine all possible avenues of defense, including questioning the means through which any evidence against you may have been obtained.  Contact us for a consultation without delay.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab