Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

State Supreme Court Hears Key Case on Defendants’ Access to Social Media to Build Case


On March 6th, the California Supreme Court heard a case that could have broad implications for the rest of the country regarding the ability for criminal defendants to access social media information in order to build the best, most comprehensive defense, as is their legal right.

Specifically, the case could determine just how much pretrial access defendants can have when it comes to witness’ social media accounts, and will also inevitably address the question of where the boundary is drawn between what is considered public and private in the digital world, and when/how a digital user provides lawful consent for others to access content under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).

What Does The Stored Communications Act Say, Exactly?

The SCA governs how service providers handle this data. In criminal defense cases, it frequently comes up as an issue in deciding to what extent criminal defendants can gain pretrial access to witness’ social media accounts in order to build their defense and, perhaps most importantly, cross-examine key witnesses in the case built against them.

Perhaps most importantly, the SCA addresses compelled and voluntary disclosure of stored electronic communications held by third-party internet service providers. Specifically, the law defines unlawful access to stored communications as an entity (company, etc.) intentionally accessing a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided. Many feel that the Act should be found unconstitutional, as it arguably interferes with the ability for criminal defendants to effectively assemble their own defense case and cross-examine key witnesses.

Unequal Access to Information

Prosecutors frequently argue that the Act does not imply that anyone can gain access to information, and that social media companies should decide where and when users have consented to their information being handed over to third parties. However, prosecutors are also easily able to obtain search warrants, and thus arguably have greater access to any and all information to build their cases. Shouldn’t those who are on trial be entitled to that same access? The case may ultimately come down to the question of what it means to be in possession of something.

History in the Courtroom

The case is on appeal from the First District Court, which found that the Act bars social media companies from handing over user records to criminal defendants. The Appeal decision reversed the trial judge’s ruling, which ordered various social media companies to hand over posts and logs from a witness’ social media account for review in a homicide case.

Florida and Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorneys Who Fight For Access to Necessary Information

If you have been charged with a crime, you need to work with an experienced criminal defense attorney who will fight aggressively to ensure that you have the best defense case possible assembled. This includes gaining access to any and all information necessary to cross-examine witnesses and build the best, most comprehensive defense.

Contact our defense attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out more about our comprehensive criminal defense and civil rights services.




  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab