Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

The Decision to Criminally Prosecute Florida Law Enforcement Officers Who Fail to Take Action During School Shootings

Courtroom

Florida’s decision to criminally prosecute law-enforcement officer Scott Peterson who failed to take action during a deadly mass shooting at a Florida high school has been controversial from the start. He is one of (or the) only law enforcement officers to be criminally prosecuted for felony child neglect for this oversight.

On June 6, Peterson was freed from jail; following an initial court appearance. His bond was also lowered from $102,000 to $39,500, and he was ordered to turn over his passport. In addition to seven counts of felony child neglect (i.e. failure to protect minors from abuse, exploitation and/or neglect), Peterson is also being charged with perjury and several misdemeanor counts of culpable negligence (i.e. for the “careless disregard” or “reckless indifference” for others). If convicted, he would serve almost 100 years in prison. In addition to the accused shooter, Peterson is the only person facing criminal charges in connection with the event, which arguably involved a number of other authorities as well.

Charges Against Peterson In Connection With Parkland Shooting

Criminal charges being filed against Peterson have been controversial from the start and are based on state prosecutors alleging that Peterson engaged in a criminal failure to perform his duty to protect the lives of students last year when the shooting left a number of people dead and wounded in Parkland, Florida. The investigation conducted by the Florida Department of law-enforcement found that Peterson failed to investigate where the gunfire was coming from and decided to retreat rather than take action during the seven minutes that the shooting lasted. In addition to criminal charges, one of the families of the children who was killed has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against him.

There is no question that the decision to prosecute Peterson pushes the bounds of criminal liability, where a number of legal experts have pointed out that while civil lawsuits from family members of those who suffered might be appropriate, criminal charges against Peterson are not. Specifically, time and time again, the law has indicated that there is no constitutional or criminal-based duty for law enforcement officers to protect civilians. Some have pointed out that this directly contradicts with someone in the healthcare profession, such as a nurse or daycare worker).

Contact Our Florida Criminal Defense Attorneys with Any Questions

If you have had questionable charges brought against you here in Florida in what many would argue is an effort to create a scapegoat for an otherwise difficult, tragic event, contact our experienced Orlando criminal defense attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can provide you with the very best in legal guidance and defense representation.

Resources:

reuters.com/article/us-florida-deputy/ex-officer-charged-with-negligence-in-florida-school-shooting-freed-on-bail-idUSKCN1T72LQ

cbsnews.com/news/scot-peterson-arrested-legal-experts-question-arrest-of-ex-deputy-who-didnt-confront-parkland-shooter/

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/will-it-become-a-crime-in-florida-to-avoid-assisting-someone-in-need/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #620
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2019 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab