Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

U.S. Appeals Court Points out That Sting Operations Primarily Target Blacks and Latinos

Arrested

On October 15, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals made it easier for defendants snagged in reverse sting operations to seek evidence indicating that the government engaged in serious civil rights concerns by specifically targeting blacks and Latinos in these operations. In doing so, the court painted a disturbing portrait of law enforcement luring blacks and Latinos into participating in purported robberies of fictitious stash houses. The decision provides good cause to take an entirely new look at racial profiling in a context that has largely been hidden from public view.

The case was brought by an African American defendant who was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and interfere with commerce by robbery in association with a 2012 stash house reverse sting. The defendant not only argued that he was targeted entirely due to his race, but also presented significant evidence that most-all defendants targeted by law enforcement in these investigations are either African American or Latino.

Racial Profiling & Entrapment?

These operations can be traced back to Miami in the 1990s, when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms decided to stage them in an effort to crack down on drug cartels moving large amounts of cocaine through South Florida. Targets are usually are told that the amount of cocaine that will be stolen exceeds five kilograms—an amount which automatically triggers a minimum 10-year sentence under the law. This effort then attracts individuals who would try to poach the shipments, often resulting in attacks on innocent people. The targets are also encouraged to bring items such as guns, which then tacks on charges such as intent to participate in conspiracy to commit additional crimes.

Personal, Subjective Bias Pervasive In the Operations

According to the majority opinion, courts must recognize that the choice of locations for these stash operations tends to be neighborhoods with large black and Latino populations, and this points to evidence of intentional racial discrimination. This has become a huge issue because, in setting up these operations, the government provides the informant with a significant amount of discretion in choosing who they would like to target, which allows for a number of personal biases to enter into the process.

Clear Bias towards Racial Minorities

Interestingly, the majority opinion also pointed out that, not only have 90 percent of those convicted in stash house stings been black or Latino, but targets and their co-conspirators tend to have only modest criminal records before being targeted. In other words, law enforcement isn’t targeting the worst criminals out there with the longest records, but rather, racial minorities.

Do Not Become a Victim: Contact Our Experienced Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys

If you have been targeted by law enforcement as a result of a civil rights violation, contact our experienced criminal defense and civil rights attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can provide you with the very best in criminal defense services.

Resource:

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sting-9th-circuit-20181015-story.html

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

40 SW 13th St, Suite 901
Miami, FL 33130
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2018 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab