Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

When Can Prosecutors Use “Pattern Evidence” to Prove You Committed a Crime?

shutterstock_1120355531

If you are on trial for allegedly committing a crime, the prosecution generally cannot introduce evidence regarding any other crimes you may have committed in the past. This is considered “character evidence” and unless it has some relevance to the alleged crime, it is inadmissible. Essentially, the prosecution cannot use “prior bad acts” to pain you as a bad person who must have committed the crime you are actually on trial for now.

Federal Court Upholds Conviction of Georgia Man Charged in 5 Robberies

As with many rules governing criminal trials, however, there are exceptions. Prosecutors can introduce evidence of possible past crimes when they show a modus operandi or pattern of criminal conduct. For example, if prosecutors can show a string of robberies followed a specific pattern or methodology, evidence from all of these crimes could be used to convict the same defendant.

Indeed, this very thing happened in a recent decision from the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Pendergrass. Federal prosecutors charged the defendant with committing a series of five robberies in Georgia between November 2016 and January 2017 while using a firearm. A jury eventually convicted the defendant of all five robberies.

On appeal, the defendant argued that there was insufficient evidence to support 3 of the 5 convictions. The 11th Circuit disagreed and upheld the jury’s verdict. While the evidence was “overwhelming” to support the defendant’s convictions on 2 of the robberies–which he did not challenge on appeal–there was sufficient “evidence of the modus operandi and other evidentiary patterns” to allow the jury to infer the defendant committed all of the robberies.

To sum up, the 11th Circuit noted that all of the robberies targeted “mom-and-pop establishments,” including two stores located in the same strip mall. All of the robberies occurred at or after closing time. In each incident, the robbers “covered their faces and brandished guns in the same way.” And in four of the robberies, the same robber–the defendant, according to the prosecution–wore a red shirt and white gloves. The Court of Appeals pointed to additional pattern evidence, but you get the point.

It is worth noting that modus operandi evidence can be admissible even when one of the items in the alleged “pattern” does not seem to fit. In the Pendergrass appeal, the defense noted that one of the five robberies was “inconsistent” with the others because that was the only incident where the “customers and employees were locked in a bathroom.” The 11th Circuit noted that all of the robberies demonstrated some degree of “forcefulness” by the robbers, albeit in different forms.

Contact Florida Criminal Defense Attorney Jose Baez Today

If you are charged with a crime–or a series of possibly related crimes–you need to take the matter seriously. An experienced Orlando criminal lawyer can zealously represent your interests in court and protect your rights. Contact the Baez Law Firm today to schedule a consultation.

 

Resource:

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913681.pdf

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/when-can-you-raise-an-entrapment-defense-to-a-criminal-charge/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2021 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab