Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

Florida Must Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons This November

Forensic2

We’ve previously discussed just how unjust it is that those who have already served their time in Florida are permanently robbed of the ability to vote for the rest of their lives. Years after they have already served their sentences, ex-felons in the Sunshine State continue to be punished by being permanently disenfranchised. This election year, this sad, outdated state of things still holds, as more than one million Floridians won’t be able to cast their vote due to a previous felony conviction.

However, according to the latest survey results, most Floridians support the ballot measure coming up this November (Amendment 4) that would restore voting rights for most convicted felons who have already completed their sentences (with an exception for those who served time for murder or sex offenses). This means that nearly 1.5 million Floridians—approximately 10 percent of the voting population—could regain their voting rights in Florida, which is one of only four states where convicted felons are barred from voting even after they have completed prison, parole, and probation.

The Amendment needs at least 60 percent approval in order to pass. The Miami Herald reportedly plans to conduct a series of surveys through the November elections in an effort to gauge public support for the measure.

Could Conditional Support End Up Defeating The Ballot Measure?

Still, in spite of the amendment’s apparent widespread popularity throughout the state, a number of interest groups have expressed conditional support for the amendment, while also suggesting adding conditional language, such as requiring a “period of good behavior,” or continuing to bar those with multiple felony convictions from voting.

This Speaks To a Broader Picture Concerning What We Do To Prisoners

The issue points to a broader picture of a majority of citizens in states like Florida not only supporting the restoration of voting rights to ex-felons, but integrating some leniency and promoting rehabilitation instead of prison time for certain non-violent crimes. Overall, there is a desperate call for legislators to find and embrace alternative approaches. This approach most certainly has worked for non-violent juvenile offenders, many of whom have an opportunity to do community service and make restitution instead of doing prison time, thereby increasing their chances of reentering society.

Contact Our Florida Criminal Defense & Civil Rights Attorneys Today

In February, a federal judge ruled that Florida’s system for barring former felons of their right to vote is unconstitutional. Regardless of whether Amendment 4 passes this November, if you have been denied your civil rights as the result of a criminal charge or conviction, contact one of our experienced Florida criminal defense and civil rights attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can ensure that your rights are protected.

Resources:

washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/02/02/floridas-ban-on-ex-felons-voting-is-unconstitutional-and-biased-federal-judge-rules/?utm_term=.60cc6dec2b0e

miamiherald.com/latest-news/article219171925.html

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation