Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

How Florida Prosecutors Can “Civilly Commit” People After They Have Served Time For A Sex Crime


With most crimes, a person serves their sentence and can try and move on with their lives. But that is not always the case for people convicted of sex crimes. Florida law makes it possible for prosecutors to seek involuntary civil commitment of a person who has already served their criminal sentence if they are deemed a “sexually violent predator.”

Now, not everyone convicted of a sex crime is considered a sexually violent predator. Under Section 394.912 of the Florida Statutes, this designation is reserved for individuals who (1) have been convicted of a sexually violent offense; and (2) suffer from some “mental abnormality or personality disorder” that makes them “likely” to engage in future acts of sexual violence absent confinement.

Florida Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment in 15-Year-Old Commitment Case

Like a criminal trial, the subjects of civil proceedings to commit a sexually violent predator are entitled to a jury trial. While not quite the same as a criminal trial, the subject of the proceedings is still entitled to due process. This includes the chance to present evidence rebutting any witnesses presented by the state.

Indeed, the Florida First District Court of Appeal recently reversed a Duval County judge’s decision to grant summary judgment to the state in a civil commitment proceeding. Summary judgment is a procedure used when the relevant facts of a case are not in dispute and thus an extended trial is unnecessary. But in this particular case, Ridenhour v. State, the appellate court said the trial judge improperly applied this procedure.

The subject of this particular case completed a sentence for sex-related crimes 15 years ago. At the time of his scheduled release from prison in 2007, prosecutors moved for civil commitment. By law, the subject had the right to demand a trial on this issue within 30 days, but he waived that right, and as the First District noted the case “then bogged down for years.”

When the case finally did make it before a judge, the state’s evidence consisted of the opinions of clinical experts who believed the subject met the statutory criteria of a sexually violent predator. The subject filed his own affidavit disputing these conclusions. The judge decided to grant summary judgment to the state and ordered the subject’s civil commitment.

On appeal, the First District held the trial judge erred in deciding this case by summary judgment. Without expressing any opinions on the merits of the case, the appellate court said the trial court could not simply dismiss the subject’s affidavit, which contained his “personal knowledge of the facts” of the case, which in turn disputed the facts presented by the government’s experts. The only way to resolve this dispute, the First District concluded, was to hold a full trial.

Contact Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney Jose Baez Today

A sex crimes conviction can have long-lasting consequences that go well beyond jail time. That is why it is important to work with an experienced Orlando sex crimes lawyer if you have been charged with such offenses. Contact the Baez Law Firm today to schedule a free consultation.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation