Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

Supreme Court Sides With Suspended Cheerleader Who Cursed On Snapchat


Social media makes it possible for us to communicate with our friends, family, and even complete strangers on a continuous basis. Fortunately, we also have robust protections for freedom of speech in this country, which ensures the government cannot punish us for making critical–even vulgar–statements online. Of course, that has not always stopped certain agents of the government from trying to punish speech they dislike.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently beat back one such attempt. In Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., the Court addressed the scope of high school student’s right to use vulgar language outside of school grounds and on social media. The student in this case tried out for her high school’s varsity cheerleading squad. She did not make the varsity squad–instead making junior varsity–and she also did not get her first choice of position on a private softball team.

Later, while visiting a convenience store, the student decided to post some photos onto Snapchat. The first image featured the student and one of her friends raising their middle fingers. The caption contained vulgar language: “F–k school f–k softball f–k cheer f–k everything.” The second picture did not contain any vulgar language but did express disapproval of the coach’s decision not to put her on the cheerleading squad. Both images were available to the student’s Snapchat “friends,” which included a number of fellow students, some of whom were on the squad.

When the cheerleaders complained to their coach, they took the matter to the principal. The coaches eventually decided to suspend the student from the junior varsity cheerleading squad for using profanity “in connection with a school extracurricular activity.” After the local school board upheld the suspension, the student and her parents filed a federal lawsuit, alleging the board’s actions violated her First Amendment rights.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether public schools had any right to regulate student speech that occurred “off campus.” The Court has long held that schools have some leeway to regulate on-campus speech when it “materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others.” And in reviewing this case, the Court noted there could be cases that could “implicate a school’s regulatory interests” in off-campus speech, such as bullying or threats made against individuals. But this was not such a case.

Indeed, the Court was clear the school board violated this student’s First Amendment rights. The Snapchat posts were “criticism of the rules of a community of which [the student] forms a part.” And given the posts were made on a private smartphone to a closed circle of Snapchat friends, and occurred “outside of school hours from a location outside the school,” the school could not justify the suspension based on some purported interest in teaching “good manners” to students.

Contact Orlando Civil Rights Attorney Jose Baez Today

Cases like this illustrate the importance of standing up for civil rights, no matter how trivial it might seem. If any public official has violated your constitutionally protected liberties and you need to speak with a qualified Orlando civil rights lawyer, contact the Baez Law Firm today to schedule a consultation.



  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab