Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Adnan Syed’s Appeal


We have previously reported on the case of Adnan Syed, the subject of the popular podcast “Serial,” whose attorneys petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case. The request was an important one, as the decision by the appeals court to deny him a new trial not only uproots well-established, uniform legal precedent in criminal trials, but affects criminal defendants around the country, especially those whose initial trials were found to be deficient due to inadequate representation.

In 2016, a Maryland court and Court of Special Appeals ordered a new trial for Syed, citing an alibi witness that was completely bypassed by his defense attorney at the time. However, the state’s highest court determined, in a 4-to-3 decision, that he did not deserve a new trial even though his trial counsel was deficient. In late November, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would not consider Syed’s appeal, leaving the state appeals court decision – and his life sentence – in place.

Why The Court Should Have Granted Syed’s Petition

Syed’s alibi witness reportedly sent several letters to his defense attorney at the time, indicating that she could be a witness, but the attorney never followed up on them. Syed was a juvenile when he was sentenced to life in prison without the opportunity for parole, and still has not had an opportunity to present his alibi to a jury versus the Maryland Court of Appeals.

There are a number of reasons that The U.S. Supreme Court should have granted Syed’s petition, including the following:

  • Maryland Court of Appeals’ decision created a split among 11 state and federal courts: The Maryland Court diverges from at least 10 state and federal courts by employing a standard that makes prejudice difficult-to-impossible to show, and this is wrong. Specifically, the Court’s decision is the first to hold that a defense attorney’s failure to investigate a credible witness is not prejudicial to a defendant;
  • The question presented is important: The standard should be uniform among state and federal courts, the standing decision undermines the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel, and the decision discounts the importance of alibi witnesses; and
  • The case at hand is a clean vehicle to address the question presented.

Work with The Very Best

One mistake made by an Orlando criminal defense attorney can mean a lifetime in jail for a defendant. Regardless of how strong the evidence is, it is very difficult to obtain a new jury trial, which is why you want to work with the best possible criminal defense from the get-go.

Jose Baez is known as one of the very best lawyers in America. Contact our office today to schedule a consultation and find out more about our criminal defense services.





  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab