Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

Florida Judges Will Soon Weight Whether State Of Florida’s Restrictions On Localities With Respect To Gun Laws Violates Their Rights


Florida circuit judges will soon hear arguments concerning the constitutionality of state law that imposes significant penalties on local officials when it comes to gun regulations. The case is based on Florida’s laws that bar localities from passing regulations that are stricter than what the legislature passes in terms of state fire laws.

The penalties involved in the case are significant, and could result in local officials being removed from office and having to pay fines of up to $5,000, while also allowing the public and various organizations to receive damages in the amount of approximately $100,000. Now, these localities have filed a case challenging the constitutionality of the laws and restrictions, arguing that they violate a number of constitutional issues, including free-speech, separation of powers, vagueness, and preemption.

Argument Brought by Localities

More than 70 local officials, 30 municipalities, and three counties are participating in the case. They claim that they are being urged by constituents to proceed with important procedures– such as regulating background checks and gun purchase waiting periods–but they are essentially immobilized due to the chilling effect of the state’s preemption laws and penalties. The case has drawn supplemental briefs from organizations such as the National Rifle Association, which argues that local governments do not have legal ability to defy the state’s requirements.


These localities may very well have a good chance that the courts may agree with them, as a federal appeals court already struck down a state law that barred doctors from discussing gun policies and firearm ownership details with their patients. According to the 10-1 decision out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, the “Privacy of Firearms Owners Act” blatantly violated doctors’ First Amendment rights by threatening to take away their medical licenses and fine them up to $10,000 just for asking parents about the presence of firearms in the home.

The ruling was based on the finding that doctors were not infringing upon the Second Amendment rights of their patients by engaging in these discussions and inquiries; all while the court pointed out that Florida does not have a “carte blanche” to restrict speech without first meeting the heightened scrutiny standard/test. As a result, the court blocked the law from ever taking effect after it was passed by the legislature. The National Rifle Association also filed a supplemental brief in that case.

Contact Our Florida Civil Rights Attorneys with Any Questions

If you have questions about the constitutionality of a particular law or have concerns that your civil rights have been violated here in Florida, contact our experienced Orlando civil rights attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation