Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu

LGBTQ Advocates Are Concerned about the Administration’s New Civil Rights Probe


LGBTQ advocates are understandably concerned after the administration recently released an announcement indicating that it would be conducting a federal investigation into whether a school district’s transgender bathroom policy contributed to the sexual assault of a five-year-old girl in Georgia.

According to reports, the school district adopted a policy allowing transgender students to use bathrooms that aligned with their gender identity, and the young girl was assaulted by a male student who identified her as “genderfluid.” Federal civil rights investigators will now reportedly be looking into whether the policy created a “hostile environment for the student and other girls.” However, advocates are concerned because the administration’s complaint was filed with assistance from an organization called the “Alliance Defending Freedom,” which regularly files lawsuits challenging school district transgender policies nationwide. Specifically, many advocates are concerned that the Department of Education plans to use the incident in an effort to further a particular ideology and political viewpoint in these types of investigations, thus placing the protected rights of the LGBTQ community in jeopardy.

This Does Not Appear To Be About Child Safety

In February of this year, the administration rescinded a directive from the previous administration, which dictated that federal law protects the right of transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice. Since then, it has also halted all investigations into civil rights complaints filed by transgender students of bathroom access issues.

Yet, according to studies done on the topic, school policies affirming the rights of transgender students do not increase safety risks or sexual assault incidents committed against children, indicating that is not the specific concern of this administration.

Other LGBTQ Civil Rights at Risk

The confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court brings a number of concerns that the LGBTQ community’s civil rights are in jeopardy. Specifically, in addition to transgender bathroom policies, the following issues could very well come up for review in the high court:

  • Same-sex marriage & benefits: There has already been litigation against local governments over provisions that provide for the same benefits to same-sex employees—an issue that was not specifically addressed by the previous landmark same-sex marriage ruling out of SCOTUS. If this issue makes it to the Supreme Court, we could see a ruling that affirms the right for states to eliminate or limit benefits for same-sex couples;
  • Transgender troop ban cases: While multiple federal courts have already blocked the current administration’s attempts to implement such a ban, the U.S. Supreme Court could decide in Trump’s favor by finding that the ban is necessary for “military readiness,” (in spite of the research showing just how unfounded this is);
  • Discrimination against transgender individuals due to “religious freedom”: Cases that further the already-existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent that private businesses can deny services to same-sex couples based on “religious grounds”; and
  • Whether the ban on sex discrimination in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to LGBTQ individuals, specifically.

Contact Our Experienced Florida Civil Rights Attorneys with Questions

If you live in Florida and your civil rights have been violated due to gender identity-related issues, contact our civil rights attorneys at the Baez Law Firm today to find out how we can help you achieve justice.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation