Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer

What Is A “True Split” Sentence?


A Florida judge will often suspend a prison sentence in favor of a period of probation. In some cases, the judge will impose what is known as a “true split” sentence. Basically, this means that the judge imposes a specific prison sentence but suspends a part of it contingent on the defendant completing a similar term of probation.

For example, a court might impose a true split sentence of 6 years with 4 of those years suspended. The defendant would then need to serve 2 years in jail followed by 4 years of probation. If the defendant subsequently violated their probation, the judge could then “unsuspend” the remaining 4 years of the original sentence.

Critically, the judge is bound by the earlier true split sentence in the event of a probation violation. In other words, the judge cannot decide after a violation occurs to sentence the defendant to more prison time than was provided for by the original true split sentence. In effect, the true split sentence is a means of sentencing the defendant in advance for any probation violation that might occur.

Appeals Court Reverses 11-Year Sentence for Drug Offender Who Violated Probation

A recent decision from the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal, Dalton v. State, provides a practical illustration of what we are talking about. In this case, the defendant pleaded guilty to two felony drug charges in 2016. The sentencing court imposed concurrent five-year prison terms. After completing a youthful offender program, the trial court modified the sentence and placed the defendant on probation. But the court advised that if the defendant violated probation, the court may “impose any sentence which it might have imposed before placing you on probation.”

About three years later, the defendant admitted to a probation violation, specifically possessing illegal drugs. The trial court then imposed a new sentence on the two original charges–5 years on the first and 11 years on the second, to run concurrently with credit for time already served. The defendant appealed, arguing the 11-year sentence violated the terms of the original sentencing, which was in fact a true split sentence of 5 years.

The Fifth District agreed. The appellate court noted the trial judge’s modification of the defendant’s sentence expressly stated that a probation violation would result in the same sentence that might have been imposed prior to probation. That is to say, the defendant’s original true split sentence. As such, the maximum penalty she faced for a probation violation was the original 5-year concurrent sentence.

Contact Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney Jose Baez Today

Drug charges often bring harsh sentences from judges. That is why it is crucial to work with an experienced Orlando drug crimes lawyer when you are the person on trial. Contact the Baez Law Firm today to schedule a consultation with a member of our criminal defense team today.



  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111

Orlando Office

250 N Orange Ave, Suite 750
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms
Please review the highlighted fields. They are required.
DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab