Switch to ADA Accessible Website
Orlando Criminal Lawyer
call for a free
consultation

“Jailed for Bad Science”

Gavel_Cuffs

According to some statistics, in more than 40 percent of cases that have proven to be wrongly adjudicated, where people were convicted of serious crime such as murder or rape, false or misleading forensic science was a major factor in the wrongful conviction. And that is just based on one study: The Department of Justice and FBI also specifically found that, in 3,000 criminal cases involving hair analysis specifically, scientifically invalid testimony was used in more than 95 percent of cases to inculpate a defendant.

It is perhaps the number one myth in our era that science will always (automatically) lead us to truth, and this means that, when presented in a criminal trial, it must lead to convicting the guilty. The reality is that the precursors for most of these techniques were originally developed by police tools as investigative tools, with no real claimed connection to science. The information obtained was then somehow introduced as evidence in cases by law enforcement or lab technicians as “forensic experts,” even though none of them had extensive scientific training.

“A Reasonable Degree of Scientific Certainty”

Their testimony – described as being reached using a phrase that would become a precursor to conviction – “a reasonable degree of scientific certainty”—would also go largely uncontested due to the defense very generally not having the tools to challenge it. Thanks to DNA testing—yet another technique which has proven to be more reliable—hundreds of felons have revealed to have been convicted based on faulty forensic science, even though the technique has yet to even more being convicted of crimes. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, almost one out of four inmates exonerated of murder or other serious felonies within the last 30 years were convicted with flawed or misleading forensic evidence.

Difficulty Obtaining a New Trial

Still, a number of techniques—ballistic comparisons, bite-mark comparisons, fingerprints, blood-spatter analysis, and others—are used even though there is little science behind the forensic “sciences” and, meanwhile, innocent people spend decades in prison for crimes they did not commit, and it remains extremely difficult to get courts to reexamine questionable evidence that was used to convict them. In short, once certain findings are used to convict someone – even if they lack scientific basis – it is extremely difficult to undo the harm they’ve done. In particular, a number of judges find that new evidence is insufficient to grant a new trial when experts cannot agree on its significance.

Contact Our Orlando Forensic Science Attorneys

The Baez Law Firm specializes in the use of our own forensic science when it comes to providing criminal defense services. We know forensic science better than the prosecutors, and understand the importance of getting it done right the first time around. Contact our Orlando criminal attorneys today to find out more about our services.

Resource:

adventistreview.org/cliffs-edge-jailed-for-bad-science

https://www.baezlawfirm.com/criminal-justice-reform-advancing-again-in-florida-but-slowly/

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Miami

Miami Office

1200 Brickell Avenue #1410
Miami, FL 33131
Office: 305-999-5100
Fax: 305-999-5111
Orlando

Orlando Office

23 South Osceola Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Office: 407-705-2626
Fax: 407-705-2625

Email Us

Fields Marked * Are required

Captcha Image

DISCLAIMER: Completing and submitting this form or otherwise merely contacting The Baez Law Firm or any individual at the firm will not establish an attorney/client relationship. Our firm cannot represent you until we determine that there would be no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept representation of your case. Please do not send any information or documents until a formal attorney/client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you have been given authorization in the form of an engagement letter with The Baez Law Firm. Any information or documents sent via this form or otherwise prior to your receipt of an engagement letter will not be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature. Submitting information regarding your potential case will not bar The Baez Law Firm from representing or continuing to represent a person or entity whose interest are adverse to your in condition with your case.

DISCLAIMER: This website contains information about The Baez Law Firm that includes testimonial statements from persons who are familiar with the firm's services. The testimonials shown are not necessarily representative of every person's experience with us. Testimonials from every client are not provided. As no two situations or persons are identical, the facts and circumstances of your situation may differ from those for which testimonials are shown. This website also includes information about some of the past results that we have obtained for our clients. Not all results are provided, and the results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by us. No two situation are exactly alike; every person's situation is unique and the outcome for each person depends on the individual facts.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2020 Baez Law Firm. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab Contact Form Tab